I-Deal Society and the Constitution
What protects our individual liberties? Our class proved that the Constitution does effectively protect our individual liberties because during the Idea society, the right to protest was used, also a passage of a bill occurred. Finally, the court case, known as Miller Vs Young took place in the Supreme Court.
Throughout the whole simulation, what was always happening on the sidelines? The right to protest was in action. Most of the citizens, including myself, received cruel treatment, such as nasty remarks about our opinions. However, that did not stop the citizens from using their first amendment rights, “freedom of speech”. Even though their first amendment rights were tested when it came to the law, in my opinion, if we did not have that amendment, we as citizens would not have gotten our ideas or demands recognized or even understood.
Through all the arguments and all the yelling, a bill was proposed by Congress and signed by the President. The bill stated that if you were over 18 years of age, the I-chip was optional. If you were under the age of 18, you were not allowed to possess it. The problem this law caused is that people underage that already had the I-chip were now considered illegal. The law caused problems for everyone, even the Legislative Branch. Congress could not go into someone’s house who was illegal and just take the I-chip right out of their head. This would be thought unconstitutional in many ways, but to sum it up, it violates the 4th amendment. This amendment guarantees “ The right of the people to be secure in persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” My point is that when they put together the bill, you can tell they didn’t quite think it through all the way. However, if we had more time in the simulation, I think all of us were on the same page. The government would have probably amended the law.
To finish this simulation off, Miller vs. Young court case won back the citizens their freedom of speech. The court case arose based on some words that Miller said, which could have been taken as a threat to the President. The court case started off with Miller’s lawyer presenting a well-written speech. She cited a past case, in which a court approved a citizen’s freedom to speak. The President’s defense could not top anything like that; consequently, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Miller.
In conclusion, what I’m getting at here is that Constitution guards the citizens’ individual liberties and not just the government’s. These three key points- the right to protest, passage of a bill and the actions of the court- prove it.